Author:
Antje Richter
Publisher:
University of Washington Press
Publication Year:
2013
Abstract:
This first book-length study in Chinese or any Western language of personal
letters and letter-writing in premodern China focuses on the earliest period
(ca. 3rd-6th cent. CE) with a sizeable body of surviving correspondence. Along
with the translation and analysis of many representative letters, Antje Richter
explores the material culture of letter writing (writing supports and utensils,
envelopes and seals, the transportation of finished letters) and letter-writing
conventions (vocabulary, textual patterns, topicality, creativity). She
considers the status of letters as a literary genre, ideal qualities of letters,
and guides to letter-writing, providing a wealth of examples to illustrate each
component of the standard personal letter. References to letter-writing in other
cultures enliven the narrative throughout.
Letters and Epistolary Culture in Early Medieval China makes the
social practice and the existing textual specimens of personal Chinese
letter-writing fully visible for the first time, both for the various branches
of Chinese studies and for epistolary research in other ancient and modern
cultures, and encourages a more confident and consistent use of letters as
historical and literary sources.
Table of Contents:
Materiality and terminology --
Letters and literary thought --
Structures and phrases --
Topoi --
Normativity and authenticity
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
Et sinifisert rike?: Nordre Wei-dynastiets stilling i kinesisk historie slik det er fremstilt i engelskspråklig historievitenskap
Author:
Torheim-Sandvik, Ove Pils
Publication Year:
2011
School:
University of Oslo
Abstract:
This is a historiographical study of English language texts concerning history of the Northern Wei Dynasty. Based on available and relevant texts about Chinese history from the end of the nineteenth century until 2010, I will show in this paper how the view of the Northern Wei Dynasty (386–534), in North China, has developed. I will show that there are two main currents: One, starting around 1914, describes Northern Wei as a dynasty that was culturally transformed into a Chinese empire. This means that the accounts of the history of the Northern Wei Dynasty suggests the sinicization of the Empire. This school of thought lasts until 2010, and is especially prominent in the general history books on China. This position is not static, but evolves in the course of the twentieth century. I will also show that this current is inspired by Chinese nationalist movements in the early 1900s, but later evolved to become a generally accepted explanation of the empire. The other school of thought started in the second half of the 1970s, and is both an active and passive resistance to sinicization as an explanation of the Northern Wei Dynasty’s historical development. This resistance came as a result of historical developments in Western science, where historians and the social sciences at this time confronted and questioned the established truths and the great narratives. I will show that this second direction is not uniform, but that one is trying to find new ways to explain the narrative of the Northern Wei Dynasty. Generally, I will show that prior to 1913 there is no unified narrative, but that with the introduction of the narration of sinicization there is a unity until the end of the 1970s. From this point develop several different trends with narratives that explain the Northern Wei Dynasty’s historical development.
Table of Contents:
Innledning
Torheim-Sandvik, Ove Pils
Publication Year:
2011
School:
University of Oslo
Abstract:
This is a historiographical study of English language texts concerning history of the Northern Wei Dynasty. Based on available and relevant texts about Chinese history from the end of the nineteenth century until 2010, I will show in this paper how the view of the Northern Wei Dynasty (386–534), in North China, has developed. I will show that there are two main currents: One, starting around 1914, describes Northern Wei as a dynasty that was culturally transformed into a Chinese empire. This means that the accounts of the history of the Northern Wei Dynasty suggests the sinicization of the Empire. This school of thought lasts until 2010, and is especially prominent in the general history books on China. This position is not static, but evolves in the course of the twentieth century. I will also show that this current is inspired by Chinese nationalist movements in the early 1900s, but later evolved to become a generally accepted explanation of the empire. The other school of thought started in the second half of the 1970s, and is both an active and passive resistance to sinicization as an explanation of the Northern Wei Dynasty’s historical development. This resistance came as a result of historical developments in Western science, where historians and the social sciences at this time confronted and questioned the established truths and the great narratives. I will show that this second direction is not uniform, but that one is trying to find new ways to explain the narrative of the Northern Wei Dynasty. Generally, I will show that prior to 1913 there is no unified narrative, but that with the introduction of the narration of sinicization there is a unity until the end of the 1970s. From this point develop several different trends with narratives that explain the Northern Wei Dynasty’s historical development.
Table of Contents:
Innledning
1 386–534 – En kort historie om Nordre Wei
2 1883–1940 – Nordre Wei som kinesisk historie?
3 1940–1978 – Ideen om sinifisering utvikles
4 1976–1996 – Holmgren og hennes samtidige
5 1991–2010 – De siste to tiår
Konklusjon
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)